Modern Land and Development Recreational Lodge CUP

Represented multiple appellants asking the commission to overrule the ski lodge permit to protect open space, wildlife, and rural community character.

Voiced tribal opposition to the ski development, stating it disrespects the Ruby Mountains and wildlife.

Urged the board to closely examine county code compliance and procedural correctness to protect the county legally.

Argued that open space zoning prohibits fixed improvements like chairlifts and that the planning commission misapplied county code.

Highlighted a 1,748-signature petition opposing the permit and raised concerns about water contamination and noise pollution.

Urged commissioners not to make exceptions for commercializing the Ruby Mountains against community wishes.

Emphasized that planning commission approval did not conform to county code and that a CUP cannot be used to vary from code.

Questioned how five private chairlifts comply with open space code prohibiting fixed improvements and accessory use limitations.

Requested a stay on the decision to allow time to review case law and master plan consistency.

Stated opposition to the ski development due to viewshed impairment and commercial discrepancies in the proposal.